Animal testing a preventable inhumane act

animal testing a preventable inhumane act List of cons of animal experimentation 1 cruel and inhumane treatment protocols in animal testing are often painful to the test subjects they are forced fed, deprived of food and water, restrained physically for prolonged periods, inflicted with burns, wounds and pain to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even killed through neck-breaking or asphyxiation.

Not only are animal-based tests fundamentally inhumane, they also rely on outmoded science that can fail to accurately predict safety for humans, “the us can and should phase out the use of animals in cosmetic safety testing, said moran, in a news release. Animal research has played an important role in the expansion of medical advances, some of which include penicillin, the polio vaccine, insulin, and the eradication of one of the world's most devastating diseases known to humanity, smallpox. The animal welfare act is the only federal law that provides even minimal protection for animals in laboratories (the federal public health service's (phs) policy on the humane care and use of laboratory animals covers animals in nih-funded research, but the phs does not conduct inspections itself.

The humane cosmetics act would end animal testing for cosmetics after a 1 year phase in and would further phase out the sale of animal tested cosmetics in 3 years. “if you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal who hasn't done anything they should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. Passage of the humane cosmetics act would align us law with more than 30 countries that have already banned cosmetic animal testing and the sale of products tested elsewhere countries whose populations total more than 18 billion people ban animal testing and us companies that sell in those countries are expected to comply with those bans.

The animal welfare act, or awa, is a federal law that addresses the standard of care animals receive at research facilities this law excludes roughly 95 percent of the animals tested upon — such as rats, mice, birds, fish, and reptiles — and provides only minimal protections for the rest. Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse, animal neglect or animal cruelty, is the infliction by omission (animal neglect) or by commission by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human more narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievement, such as killing animals for food or for their fur opinions differ. The animal welfare act (awa) was the first federal law in the us regulating animals in researchthe awa applies to animal carriers, handlers, dealers, breeders, and exhibitors in addition to research laboratories, and sets minimum standards of care that must be provided for animals—including housing, handling, sanitation, food, water, veterinary care and protection from weather extremes. The humane cosmetics act would ban animal cosmetic testing in the us, saving innocent rabbits, mice and other animals from being tortured and killed in needless experiments.

The term animal testing refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives. Animal testing jessica buss eng 3 january 13, 2011 animal testing outline the purpose of this paper is to persuade and inform others that animal testing is wrong and inhumaneanimal testing is wrong and inhumanei believe that if there are alternatives for research then there is no explanation for why people should hurt or kill animals. Cruel and inhuman ways of animal testing - animal testing is a cruel and inhumane action that humans cause by holding different kinds of animals captive in small cells and testing dangerous and toxic chemicals on them. The cruelty of animal testing and the need for alternative methods in his book inhumane society: the american way of exploiting animals, dr michael w fox estimates that twenty-five to thirty-five million animals are used in the united states each year for laboratory testing and research (58.

However, animal testing provides inaccurate, misleading, and unhelpful results many products, most famously thalidomide in the 1970’s, have been proven safe when tested on animals, but caused. (a) the word torture as used in this article shall mean the act of doing physical injury to a dog or cat by the infliction of inhumane treatment or gross physical abuse meant to cause said animal intensive or prolonged pain or serious physical injury, or thereby causing death due to said act. Testing can also require a specific number of animals before a stamp of approval is given skin sensitization tests require as many as 32 guinea pigs or 16 mice to better understand whether a product will cause allergic reactions, a substance is applied or injected in the animals’ skin.

Support legislation to end inhumane cosmetics testing on animals by: sign today and urge your us representative to support for the humane cosmetics act to prohibit animal testing for cosmetics manufactured or sold in the us support legislation to end inhumane cosmetics testing on animals. Originally passed in 1958, the law that is enforced today by the usda food safety and inspection service (fsis) was passed as the humane slaughter act of 1978 this act requires the proper treatment and humane handling of all food animals slaughtered in usda inspected slaughter plants. In 2000, california became the first state to ban animal testing whenever alternative methods are available this bill, if passed, would take it one step further by banning the sales of any.

  • Animal protection laws of the united states of america are the top resources for lawyers, law professors, law students, legislators, other legal professionals, and anyone who wants the most comprehensive animal protection laws collection of its kind available.
  • The use of animals in experiments and testing is regulated under the animals (scientific procedures) act 1986 (aspa) aspa has recently been revised to change the european directive 2010/63/eu on.

People for the ethical treatment of animals (peta / ˈ p iː t ə / stylized peta) is an american animal rights organization based in norfolk, virginia, and led by ingrid newkirk, its international presidenta nonprofit corporation with nearly 400 employees, it claims that it has 65 million members and supporters, in addition to claiming that it is the largest animal rights group in the world. Animal testing and research facts knowing that lab animals are treated respectfully, responsibly and as humanely as possible strengthens our understanding – as does separating the facts from the myths. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results. The humane cosmetics act -- which would ban animal cosmetic testing in the us -- has been re-introduced in the house it’s time to pass this bill and save countless animals from being used in tortuous and unnecessary experiments.

Animal testing a preventable inhumane act
Rated 5/5 based on 33 review